<above pic: We have no intention of causing more shame to the young boys involved>
Kind of intriguing, I thought it's innocent until proven guilty by the courts, but yet in this case, the 5 were
a) Handcuffed
b) Head shaved
c) Prominently photoed by the media
Also, one of them was caught in his workplace and requested to the court judge that he be allowed to call his family members to inform them but the judge did not agree but refer the matter to the police ... Since when did the law not allow a 17 year old to call his parent when being detained by the police ???
Also, would the police have acted as swiftly if the graffiti were directed against other political party instead of the ruling party. I thought the police ought to make a clear distinction between PAP as a political party and the government ...
I come to this conclusion because much more serious crimes like loansharks disturbing peace of HDB dwellers, police seems inept to do anything about it ... But for this minor vandalising case, they were damn swift to say the least !!!
Walter Oh
Related: PAP PROPAGANDA MEDIA CENSOR OUT "F**K THE PAP" BUT SHAME UNDERAGE 17 YEAR OLDS?